Vietnamese Merger Law: Missed Opportunities in Applying the Potential Competition Theory

Authors

  • Hieu Trong Truong Author

Keywords:

potential, competition, merger, non-horizontal, Vietnam

Abstract

Potential competition theory is widely used all over the world. Notably, it plays a crucial role in merger regulation. In Vietnam, competition law is gradually moving towards an effects-based approach. However, this approach is applied inconsistently, with the law sometimes providing only minimal guidance or even staying silent altogether. It therefore remains a topical issue, leading to an ineffective mechanism to effectively catch mergers that could possibly impact competition. This article begins with a review of the potential competition theory, before examining merger control in other jurisdictions, particularly US antitrust law and enforcement, from which the potential competition theory supposedly stems and where it is effectively applied. The article then highlights certain aspects that Vietnam should explore in order to address existing problems and, more importantly, to implement a functional regime to mitigate the harmful effects of mergers. These recommendations include factors and proven methods applied to enhance the analytical framework for merger assessment.

 

References

Nguyen, T. (2025). Vietnamese merger law: Missed opportunities in applying the potential competition theory. World Competition, *48*(2).

U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Horizontal merger guidelines. https://www.justice.gov/atr/horizontal-merger-guidelines-08192010

Salop, S. C. (2018). Potential competition and the AT&T/Time Warner decision. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications, 1–25.

Katz, M. L., & Shelanski, H. A. (2017). Mergers and innovation. Antitrust Law Journal, *82*(2), 465–500.

Gilbert, R. J., & Greene, H. (2015). Merging innovation into antitrust agency enforcement of the Clayton Act. Competition Policy International, *10*(2), 13–36.

European Commission. (2004). Guidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings. OJ C 31, 5–18.

General Court of the European Union. (2017). Case T-471/13: Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS and Alpharma LLC v European Commission [Judgment].

Vietnamese Competition Law. (2018). Law No. 23/2018/QH14 of June 12, 2018, on Competition.

Decree No. 35/2020/ND-CP. (2020). Detailing the implementation of certain provisions of the Competition Law.

Vietnam Competition Commission. (2025). Results of economic concentration control in Vietnam in the period of 2020–2024. https://en.vcc.gov.vn

ICLE. (2026). ICLE Comments on Amendments to Vietnam Law No. 23/2018/QH14. International Center for Law & Economics. https://laweconcenter.org

ASEAN Competition. (2024). Vietnam merger control regime. ASEAN Competition.

https://asean-competition.org

PLF Law Firm. (2023). How competition law shapes M&A transactions in Vietnam. https://plf.vn

Salop, S. C. (2019). Potential competition and the antitrust analysis of mergers. Concurrences, *4*, 1–10.

Hovenkamp, H. (2015). Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its Practice (5th ed.). West Academic Publishing.

Motta, M. (2004). Competition Policy: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2023). Competition and foresight: Anticipating future market developments. OECD Publishing.

UNCTAD. (2021). Strategic foresight in competition policy. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

ICLE. (2026). ICLE Comments on amendments to Vietnam's Competition Law. International Center for Law & Economics. https://laweconcenter.org

Nguyen, T. (2025). Vietnamese merger law: Missed opportunities in applying the potential competition theory. World Competition, *48*(2), 77–94.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25