How Kantian is Kelsen’s Early Theory of International Law?
Keywords:
Kelsen, Kant, mass democracy, sovereignty, international law, civitas maximaAbstract
In this article, the author examines the influence of Immanuel Kant’s philosophical ideas on Hans Kelsen’s early theory of international law. He situates Kelsen’s work within the post-World War I context, where Kant’s vision of perpetual peace significantly impacted the creation of international organizations. The article delves into Kelsen’s seminal work “Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts,” exploring how Kelsen’s pure theory of law parallels and diverges from Kant’s concepts. While Kelsen’s ideas were shaped by Kantian philosophy, particularly in promoting a lawful international order, Kelsen transcended Kant by developing a more rigorous, epistemologically grounded legal theory. The author argues that Kelsen’s adaptation of Kantian principles reflects both a continuation and transformation of Kant’s vision, tailored to the political and cultural challenges of early 20th-century Europe.
References
1
Patrick O. Cohrs, The New Atlantic Order: The Transformation of International Politics, 1860–1933 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022), 260.
2
Fritz Stern, The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974), xi.
3
Jeffrey C. Alexander, The Dark Side of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013), 17.
4
Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York: Scribner and Sons, 1958), 182.
5
Stefan Zweig, The World of Yesterday, trans. Anthea Bell (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009), 65–80.
6
Jeffrey C. Alexander, “Between Progress and Apocalypse: Social Theory and the Dream of Reason in the Twentieth Century,” in Rethinking Progress: Movements, Forces, and Ideas at the End of the Twentieth Century, ed. Jeffrey C. Alexander and Piotr Sztompka (Boston: Hyman, 1990), 15.
7
Hans Brunkhorst, “Critique of Dualism: Hans Kelsen and the Twentieth Century Revolution in International Law,” Constellations 18 (2011): 504.
8
David Cortright, Peace: A History of Movements and Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 2.
9
See: Dina Gusejnova, “Noble Continent? German-Speaking Nobles as Theorists of European Identity in the Interwar Period,” in Europe in Crisis: Intellectuals and the European Idea, 1917–1957, ed. Mark Hewitson and Matthew D’Auria (New York: Berghahn Books, 2012), 111–135.
10
Cohrs, The New Atlantic Order, 231.
11
Cortright, Peace, 45.
12
Martti Koskenniemi, “International Law in the World of Ideas,” in The Cambridge Companion to International Law, ed. James Crawford and Martti Koskenniemi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 47.
13
Martti Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 113.
14
Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations, 209–214.
15
Cohrs, The New Atlantic Order, 43, 71.
16
See: Paul Honigsheim, “Georg Jellinek und die Internationale Staatengemeinschaft,” Die Friedens-Warte 51 (1953): 65–72.
17
See: Roger Chickering, Imperial Germany and a World Without War: The Peace Movement and German Society, 1892–1914 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016), 302, 431.
18
See: Natasha Wheatley, The Life and Death of States: Central Europe and the Transformation of Modern Sovereignty (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023), 154.
19
Mark Mazower, Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999), 7.
20
Scott J. Shapiro and Oona A. Hathaway, The Internationalists: And Their Plan to Outlaw War (New York: Allen Lane, 2017), 245.
