A True Copy? Documents and the Production of Legality in the Bombay Inam Commission
Keywords:
Indian-language documentation, legality, colonial western India, Bombay Inam Commission, tax-free land revenue, property claims, Marathi documents,Abstract
This essay examines the role of Indian-language documentation in the production of legality in colonial western India, focusing on the workings of the Bombay Inam Commission (1852-1863). It situates legal validation of claims to tax-free land revenue within the broader process of securing, organizing, classifying, and registering Marathi- and Persian-language documents. Combating the effects of rain, dirt, and pests on old state records often sold as “waste paper,” the Inam Commission deployed material interventions to secure a legal archive for verifying individual claims to property. While such evidence weighed heavily in the evaluation of the testimony and corroborating documents of an individual claimant’s case-file, questions of writing also shaped the legal reasoning of the Commission. Inquiries about any given document’s conformity to or deviation from conventional style figured prominently in judgments about its authenticity. The scribe Sayyid Usman’s investigation in 1856 of a date in a Persian document attributed to the Mysore ruler Tipu Sultan struggled to establish the parameters of conventional style against the plurality of entangled regimes of property. I argue that a material approach to writing allows us to better understand the imperfect and dispersed production of legal truth in imperial settings.
References
1
Pune Archives (hereafter PA), Karnatak Jamav Daftar (Farsi Munshi), rumal 819, torn sheet of brown paper.
2
Donato, Maria Pia, “Introduction: Archives, Record-Keeping, and Imperial Governance, 1500–1800,” Journal of Early Modern History 22 (2018): 311–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for an assessment of archival formation and record-keeping in early modern South Asia, see Nandini Chatterjee, Elizabeth Thelen, and Dominic Vendell, “Cultures of Documentation in Early Modern South Asia: Mughal, Maratha and Rajput Archives,” in The Oxford Handbook of the Mughal World, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190222642.001.0001 (forthcoming).
3
Ogborn, Miles, Indian Ink: Script and Print in the Making of the English East India Company (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for an important argument about the Company's foundational state capacities, see Stern, Philip, The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar.
4
Siddique, Asheesh Kapur, “Mobilizing the ‘State Papers’ of Empire: John Bruce, Early Modernity, and the Bureaucratic Archives of Britain,” Journal of Early Modern History 22 (2018): 392–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also see Siddique, , “The Archival Epistemology of Political Economy in the Early Modern British Atlantic World,” The William and Mary Quarterly 77 (2020): 641–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5
Smith, Richard Saumarez, “Rule-by-Records and Rule-by-Reports: Complementary Aspects of the British Imperial Rule of Law,” Contributions to Indian Sociology 19 (1985): 153–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Moir, Martin, “Kaghazi Raj: Notes on the Documentary Basis of Company Rule, 1783-1858,” Indo-British Review 21 (1996): 185–93Google Scholar.
6
Raman, Bhavani, Document Raj: Writing and Scribes in Early Colonial South India (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012), 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7
Hull, Matthew, “The File: Agency, Authority, and Autography in an Islamabad Bureaucracy,” Language & Communication 23 (2003): 287–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ghosh, Shrimoyee, “A Material History of Early Stamp't Paper,” in Iterations of Law: Legal Histories from India, ed. Balachandran, Aparna, Pant, Rashmi, and Raman, Bhavani (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 211–41Google Scholar; and Singha, Radhika, “Colonial Law and Infrastructural Power: Reconstructing Community, Locating the Female Subject,” Studies in History 19 (2003): 87–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8
While this literature is vast, an important intervention that usefully summarizes the terms of the debate is Wagoner, Philip, “Precolonial Intellectuals and the Production of Colonial Knowledge,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 45 (2003): 783–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also see Raj, Kapil, “Mapping Knowledge Go-Betweens in Calcutta, 1770–1820,” in The Brokered World: Go-Betweens and Global Intelligence, 1770–1820, ed. Schaffer, Simon, Roberts, Lissa, Raj, Kapil, and Delbourgo, James (Sagamore Beach, MA: Watson Publishing International, 2009), 105–50Google Scholar.
9
Bellenoit, Hayden, The Formation of the Colonial State in India: Scribes, Paper and Taxes, 1760–1860 (London and New York: Routledge, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; on histories of scribal service people, see O'Hanlon, Rosalind, Venkatkrishnan, Anand, and Williams, Richard David, “Scribal Service People in Motion: Culture, Power and the Politics of Mobility in India's Long Eighteenth Century, c. 1680–1820,” Indian Economic and Social History Review 57 (2020): 443–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10
Bayly, C.A., Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.
11
Cohn, Bernard S., “The Command of Language and the Language of Command,” in Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 16–56Google Scholar.
12
Fisher, Michael, “The Office of Akhbār Nawīs: The Transition from Mughal to British Forms,” Modern Asian Studies (hereafter MAS) 27 (1993): 45–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Travers, Robert, “Indian Petitioning and Colonial State-Formation in Eighteenth-Century Bengal,” MAS 53 (2019): 89–122Google Scholar; and Chatterjee, Nandini, “Mahzar-namas in the Mughal and British Empires: The Uses of an Indo-Islamic Legal Form,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 58 (2016): 379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13
James Pickett and Paolo Sartori, “From the Archetypical Archive to Cultures of Documentation,” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 62 (2019): 773–98.
14
Eve Krakowski and Marina Rustow, “Formula as Content: Medieval Jewish Institutions, the Cairo Geniza, and the New Diplomatics,” Jewish Social Studies 20 (2014): 111–46.
15
Nandini Chatterjee, Negotiating Mughal Law: A Family of Landlords across Three Indian Empires (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), 22.
16
The literature on land revenue and property rights in colonial India is voluminous. For the classic account of a legal “rule of property,” see Ranajit Guha, A Rule of Property for Bengal: an Essay on the Idea of Permanent Settlement, second edition (Durham: Duke University Press, 1996); also see Robert Travers, Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth-Century India: The British in Bengal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 67–99.
17
See Nandini Chatterjee and Leonard Hodges, “The Power of Parwanas: Indo-Persian Grants and the Making of Empire in Eighteenth-Century Southern India,” in this issue.
18
A.T. Etheridge, Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, No. 132 (New Series): Narrative of the Bombay Inam Commission and Supplementary Settlements (Bombay: Government Central Press), 23.
19
For the broader impact of the Commission, see Neil Charlesworth, Peasants and Imperial Rule: Agriculture and Agrarian Society in the Bombay Presidency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 53–56; Rachel Sturman, The Government of Social Life in Colonial India: Liberalism, Religious Law, and Women's Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 54–57.
20
Prachi Deshpande, “Scripting the Cultural History of Language: Modi in the Colonial Archive,” in New Cultural Histories of India: Materiality and Practices, ed. Partha Chatterjee, Tapati Guha-Thakurta, and Bodhisattva Kar (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2014), 65.
21
For the composition and circulation of files in France's Conseil d'Etat, see Bruno Latour, The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat, trans. Marina Brilman and Alain Pottage (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010), 70–106.
22
Pune Archives (hereafter PA), English Records, list 2, rumal 3, file 64, ff. 20–25.
23
PA, English Records, list 12, rumal 1, file 22, no. 68.
24
PA, English Records, list 12, rumal 1, file 5, ff. 109–10.
25
Ibid., file 7, ff. 7a.
26
Ibid., file 32, no. 557; file 38, no. 647.
27
Ibid., file 7, no. 302, ff. 52a–53a.
28
PA, English Records, list 2, rumal 3, no. 382, ff. 98–99.
29
PA, English Records, list 12, rumal 1, file 7, no. 894, ff. 38b.
30
Seals were also routinely affixed to the doors and windows of IC record rooms and personal residences. See PA, English Records, list 12, rumal 1, file 2, no. 510, ff. 5–6; file 8, no. 51, 73.
31
PA, English Records, list 12, rumal 1, file 9, no. 1079; also see file 5, no. 507, ff. 111; and file 7, no. 586.
32
PA, English Records, list 12, rumal 1, file 13, no. 553, 69.
33
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 38, file 2A, no. 442, ff. 72–73.
34
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, file 2A, no. 442, ff. 78–81.
35
Ibid., file 17, no. 1000, ff. 78–79.
36
Ibid., file 20, ff. 280–81.
37
PA, English Records, list 2, rumal 2, file 49, ff. 16.
38
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, file 20, ff. 347.
39
W.H. Sykes, “Land Tenures of the Dukhun (Deccan),” The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 3 (1836): 369.
40
G.S. Sardesai, Hand Book to the Records in the Alienation Office Poona (Bombay: Government Central Press, 1933), 1–3, 11–23.
41
Much will be learned from the publication of Prachi Deshpande, Inscribing the Story of Marathi: Script and Writing in a South Asian Language, unpublished manuscript cited with the author's permission; also see Sumit Guha, “Serving the Barbarian to Preserve the Dharma: The Ideology and Training of a Clerical Elite in Peninsular India c. 1300–1800,” IESHR 47 (2010): 499–501.
42
For the judicial role of local assemblies, see Rosalind O'Hanlon, “In the Presence of Witnesses: Petitioning and Judicial ‘Publics’ in Western India, Circa 1600–1820,” MAS 53 (2019): 52–88.
43
G.H. Khare, Nivadak Lekh (Pune: Bharat Itihas Sanshodhak Mandal, 1972), 224.
44
Etheridge, Selections, 56.
45
PA, English Records, list 2, rumal 3, file 69, ff. 38.
46
Ibid., ff. 42.
47
See Alicia Schrikker and Byapti Sur, “An Empire in Disguise: the Appropriation of Pre-existing Modes of Governance in Dutch South Asia, 1650‒1800,” in this issue.
48
PA, Inam Chaukashi Daftar, rumal 353, file 3, ff. 109.
49
PA, English Records, list 2, rumal 3, file 59, ff. 26.
50
Ibid., file 55, ff. 30.
51
Ibid., file 55, ff. 26–27.
52
Ibid., file 51, ff. 134–35.
53
Ibid., file 50, ff. 12.
54
Ibid., file 50, ff. 15.
55
Ibid., file 50, ff. 8.
56
PA, Karnatak Jamav Daftar, rumal 819, arz-dasht dated March 1, 1859.
57
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, file 2A, ff. 78–81.
58
PA, English Records, list 2, rumal 4, file 69, ff. 20.
59
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 40, file 28, ff. 39, 54, 70, 83.
60
PA, Karnatak Jamav Daftar, rumal 819, copy of a farman regarding Sayyid Ali, son of Sayyid Asghar, dated 10 Ramzan 1092 AH.
61
PA, Karnatak Jamav, rumal 819, IC no. 1927.
62
Ibid., Modi letter in response to IC no. 1927.
63
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, file 2A, ff. 178.
64
Ibid., ff. 175–76.
65
Ibid., ff. 180.
66
Ibid., ff. 181–82.
67
Ibid., ff. 182.
68
Ibid., ff. 185.
69
Ibid., ff. 187.
70
Ibid., ff. 191-3.
71
Hasan, Farhat, “Property and Social Relations in Mughal India: Litigations and Disputes at the Qazi's Court in Urban Localities, 17th-18th Centuries,” JESHO 61 (2018): 851–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Chatterjee, Negotiating Mughal Law, 171–90.
72
Elizabeth D. Lhost, “Between Community and Qānūn: Documenting Islamic Legal Practice in Nineteenth-Century British India,” University of Chicago, 2017, unpublished manuscript.
73
Ibid., 119, 125–26.
74
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, File 2A, ff. 193.
75
While the mufti was right to point out that the Hijri and Fasli calendars are different, the conversion from one to the other differed by period and region. See Edward Thomas, ed., Useful Tables, Illustrative of the Coins, Weights, and Measures of British India; Together with Chronological Tables and Genealogical Lists, Having Reference to India and Other Kingdoms of Asia (London: John Murray, 1858), 168–70.
76
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, file 2A, ff. 196.
77
Ibid., ff. 189.
78
For the Shaka and Jovian (Brihaspati) calendars, see Salomon, Richard, Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 182–84, 197–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
79
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, file 2A, ff. 201–2.
80
For the memory of Tipu today, see Nair, Janaki, “Tipu Sultan, the Power of the Past and the Possibility of a ‘Historical Temper’,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 43 (2020): 581–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
81
Simmons, Caleb, Devotional Sovereignty: Kingship and Religion in India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 31–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Brittlebank, Kate, Tipu Sultan's Search for Legitimacy: Islam and Kingship in a Hindu Domain (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.
82
Kirkpatrick, William, “The Calendar of Tippoo Sultan,” in State and Diplomacy under Tipu Sultan: Documents and Essays, ed. Habib, Irfan (New Delhi: Tulika, 2001), 151–62Google Scholar.
83
Roy, Madhabi, “Hukmnama for the Treasury Department of Tipu Sultan,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 77 (2016): 324–25Google Scholar. The Royal Collection houses an ornate Kannada translation of a hukmnama relating to the accounts and grants of a matha. I thank Prachi Deshpande for sharing this information.
84
Greville, Charles Frances, British India Analyzed: The Provincial and Revenue Establishments of Tippoo Sultaun and of Mahomedan and British Conquerors in Hindostan (London: R. Faulder, 1795), 26Google Scholar.
85
PA, English Records, list 1, rumal 39, file 2A, ff. 204–5.
